When I was ten, my father got diagnosed with high cholesterol. My mother was the cook in our house and within days she was deep in the American Heart Association cookbook and ordering a subscription to Cooking Light. Gone were the omelets, steaks, and sour cream from our lives. They were replaced by cheerios, pasta, and skinless chicken breasts.
At the time, this did not seem that remarkable to me. But now, looking back, I am impressed with my mother’s willingness to uproot an entire family’s dietary lifestyle for the health of one member of the family. If my dad’s eating habits had to change, all of our eating habits had to change. It would not be fair to him if he was eating a piece of fish while the rest of us chomped down on hamburgers.
Our passage from 1 Corinthians today is also about dietary choices that are good for a community, but the situation Paul is responding to is not as simple as one member of the Corinthian community having high cholesterol!
Corinth was a Greek town with a predominantly Hellenistic culture. Part of that culture was idol worship. Small statues would be placed on altars and these “gods” would be given gifts of food. The food would later be eaten by people in social gatherings. The religious and social life was entwined together.
This created a huge problem for Corinthian Christians. After all, they certainly did not believe in worshiping idols or that these small “gods” even existed. To them, there was only one God.
The Corinthian Christians had broken into two camps. The first was a group who approached the situation intellectually. They were secure in their faith, they knew no other gods existed. Since no other gods existed, then food offered to those gods was no different from any other food. For this group of Christians, joining in the social eating of food offered to idols was not a problem at all.
The second group of Corinthian Christians were not so sure. At one point in their lives they, too, had offered up food to idols, and that time was recently enough that eating food to those same idols now made them nervous. To these Christians, eating the food offered to idols was acknowledging the gods they represented and was just plain wrong.
And this is where Paul comes in. Paul has been asked to adjudicate this dispute. He acknowledges that the first group, the intellectuals, are right from a philosophical viewpoint. He states,
Hence, as to the eating of food offered to idols, we know that “no idol in the world really exists,” and that “there is no God but one.” Indeed, even though there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth– as in fact there are many gods and many lords– yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.
He agrees with their argument that since there is only one God for the Christians-even if another culture thinks there are many gods-then idols don’t exist so food offered to them is food offered to nothing.
However, just as that group is feeling pretty proud of themselves for being right, Paul turns the argument.
But take care that this liberty of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak. For if others see you, who possess knowledge, eating in the temple of an idol, might they not, since their conscience is weak, be encouraged to the point of eating food sacrificed to idols? So by your knowledge those weak believers for whom Christ died are destroyed. But when you thus sin against members of your family, and wound their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ. Therefore, if food is a cause of their falling, I will never eat meat, so that I may not cause one of them to fall.
In other words, just because the intellectual argument was correct, does not mean that eating the meat offered to idols was right. By eating the meat, the first group was threatening the faith of the second group. Members of the second group may know that there is only one God in their head, but that deep knowledge may not have penetrated their heart yet. Worshiping many gods may still be a temptation for them. Because of this Paul is saying that he, for one, would choose not to eat the meat sacrificed to idols in front of Corinthian Christians. Eating the meat did not matter one way or the other to God, but wounding another Christian was absolutely not acceptable.
Paul is telling the Corinthian Christians that they are in this journey together. They need each other. If eating meat sacrificed to idols threatens the faith of some of the community, than the entire community should abstain from eating the meat.
In the modern church we do not have a direct comparison to this problem. As far as I know none of you were part of an idol worshiping religion before you came to Emmanuel!
However, I think we can learn about sticking together from this passage. Paul sums it up well when he says, “Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up.”
The desire to be right, the desire to win an argument can blind us to the needs of others. Whether we are on our high horse about our political beliefs or whose turn it is to take out the trash, our single mindedness can be deadly to our relationships. I find it helpful to step back from an argument and think about what I really want. Do I really want to prove that I cleaned exactly 61% of the house or am I just looking for some affirmation and gratitude for the work that I did? Ultimately what we want, I think is to feel heard and loved in our lives. When we don’t feel that, being “right” is the next best thing. But what we really want, is love.
The foundation of any good relationship is love. We want love ourselves, but we are also asked to give love. Part of love is seeking the good of the other, even if it means some sacrifice for yourself. Paul asked the intellectual group of Corinthians to be generous to their brothers and sisters. We are called to be generous, too. For instance, if you live with an alcoholic, the generous response is to not keep alcohol in the house. If you are friends with someone who is pinching pennies, the generous response is to plan a walk through a park together, rather than a shopping trip. If your father has just had a heart attack, the generous response is to not bring him over those bacon wrapped twinkies you just deep fried. While none of us can control the behavior of another person we can help to make life a little easier. We can refrain from being “stumbling blocks” to those around us.
We are a community that worships one God. And that God reminds us over and over again to love our neighbors as ourselves. We are bound together by our faith in God, but those binds can enrich us as much as they limit us. By rooting our identities in a community rather than in our individual lives, we become kinder, more open minded, flexible and loving. Seeing the world through the different lenses of members of our community helps us to be creative and to learn. Our community makes us stronger. Our community makes us better Christians.